Good alt-text for this image could be: “My golden retriever dog, Scully, posing for a photo in the living room”. This description is too vague and does not provide information to users. Poor alt-text can mislead, confuse and alienate people who rely on assistive technology.Īn example of bad alt-text for the above image would be “dog”. Well-written alt-text can broaden a person’s understanding. The cost of writing misleading, unhelpful or irrelevant alt-text is at the user’s expense. Some users may also have images turned off in areas with slow internet access.) Bad alt-text (Alt-text is also shown when images do not load on a web page. Writing effective alt-text offers Search Engine Optimisation (SEO) benefits too if written well.
If not, that information becomes inaccessible to those users.
Don alt code#
It can be added to HTML code and functions as an invisible description for any image presented on a web page.Īlt-text does not affect how an image is displayed. It’s also known as “alt attributes,” “alt descriptions” and often wrongly referred to as “alt tags”. What is alt-text?Īlt-text stands for alternative text. All Twitter, Facebook and Instagram users can now add alt-text to posts. But will be useful to anyone who publishes to social media.
This guidance is aimed at content editors, authors and managers.
Don alt how to#
But knowing how to write an image description that is actually useful can be a little harder. So why, given its importance, is alt-text often so badly implemented?įrom a technical perspective, image alt-text is simple to add for anyone familiar with a content management system. In June, Judge Kaplan let her amend her lawsuit to add Trump’s comments from a CNN town hall following the jury verdict, in which he called her account “fake” and labelled her a “whack job”.WebAIM’s analysis of the top homepages in the world continues to cite missing alt-text as one of the most common accessibility failings. She is seeking at least US$10 million in damages.
Don alt trial#
Ms Carroll’s original lawsuit is scheduled for a Jan 15 trial in 2024. On Tuesday, he countersued Ms Carroll, claiming that she defamed him in a CNN interview one day after the May 9 verdict by saying “oh yes he did, oh yes he did”, when asked about the jury finding that he did not commit rape. Trump, the front runner for the 2024 Republican presidential nomination, is appealing the US$5 million jury verdict. “Mr Trump does not identify any connection between the allegedly defamatory content of his statements – that Ms Carroll fabricated her sexual assault accusation and did so for financial and personal gain – and any official responsibility of the president,” Judge Kaplan wrote. The judge also said Trump’s criticism of Ms Carroll went beyond “the outer perimeter of his official duties” as president. In his 46-page decision, Judge Kaplan said Trump waited too long to raise the absolute immunity defence, and that it would be unfair to Ms Carroll to let him do so now and further delay the 3½-year-old case. That prompted Trump, 77, to say he had not known Ms Carroll, that she was not his “type”, and that she lied to drum up book sales.
0 kommentar(er)
